If you’re a sun worshipper, like me, this is a must read. Clean sunscreen is just as important as clean skincare. For the second time in less than a year, a study of common sunscreen ingredients has established that the chemicals are absorbed into the bloodstream at concentrations far greater than the Food and Drug Administration’s safety threshold.
WHAT THE SCIENCE SAYS
Previous studies have indicated a possible association between some of the chemicals and health risks such as endocrine disruption and reproductive harm, but no comprehensive safety data are available. A proposed FDA rule, which was expected to be finalized last November, would have required the industry to complete additional testing of up to a dozen chemicals to make sure sunscreens are safe. However, the proposal was shelved in March when President Trump signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act into law.
The Cares Act overhauled how over-the-counter drugs, including sunscreens, are regulated, and it retained the 1999 sunscreen rule, which says the active ingredients currently on the market are safe and effective. This finding is not accurate and in the latest 2020 study the FDA and Environmental Working Group have identified ingfredients that may harm the endocrine system, disrupt hormones or potentially cause cancer.
Thank goodness we have a choice about what kind of sunscreen to choose! EWG, advises consumers to choose sunscreens made with zinc oxide or titanium dioxide. EWG assessed more than 700 currently available beach and sport sunscreens and found that only about a quarter of the products offer adequate protection and don’t contain concerning ingredients. The 9 most common active ingredients of those 700 were identified in EWG’s Guide to Sunscreen concluding oxybenzone was the most worrisome. Here is some information about the good the bad and the ugly when it comes to sunscreen ingredients:
|
Chemical |
FDA 2019 Proposed Status |
Skin Penetration |
Hormone Disruption |
Skin Allergy and Other Concerns |
|
Oxybenzone1 Widespread use |
Insufficient data to determine safety and concerns for skin absorption and hormone disruption |
FDA study found blood levels 438 times above cutoff for systemic exposure; detected in nearly every American; found in mothers’ milk |
Weak estrogen, moderate anti-androgen; associated with altered birth weight in human studies |
Relatively high rates of skin allergy |
|
Octinoxate Widespread use |
Insufficient data to determine safety – significant data gaps |
FDA study found blood levels 13 times above cutoff for systemic exposure; found in breast milk |
Hormone-like activity; reproductive system, thyroid and behavioral alterations in animal studies |
Moderate rates of skin allergy |
|
Homosalate3 Widespread use |
Insufficient data to determine safety – significant data gaps |
FDA study found blood levels 37 times above cutoff for systemic exposure; found in breast milk |
Disrupts estrogen, androgen and progesterone |
Toxic breakdown products |
|
Octisalate4
Widespread use and stabilizes avobenzone |
Insufficient data to determine safety – significant data gaps |
FDA study found blood levels 10 times above cutoff for systemic exposure; skin penetration in lab studies |
N/A |
Rarely reported skin allergy |
|
Octocrylene5
Widespread use |
Insufficient data to determine safety – significant data gaps |
FDA study found blood levels 14 times above cutoff for systemic exposure; found in breast milk |
N/A |
Relatively high rates of skin allergy |
|
Titanium dioxide6
(higher in products that are powder or spray)
Widespread use |
Generally recognized as safe and effective |
No finding of skin penetration |
No evidence of hormone disruption |
Inhalation concerns |
|
Zinc oxide7
(higher in products that are powder or spray)
Widespread use and excellent UVA protection |
Generally recognized as safe and effective |
Less than 0.01% skin penetration of zinc in human volunteers |
No evidence of hormone disruption |
Inhalation concerns |
|
Avobenzone8
Widespread use and the best UVA protection of non-mineral filters |
Insufficient data |
FDA study found blood levels 9 times above cutoff for systemic exposure |
No evidence of hormone disruption |
Breakdown product causes relatively high rates of skin allergy; unstable in sunshine – must be mixed with stabilizers |
|
Mexoryl SX9
Uncommon use but strong UVA protection |
Insufficient data |
Less than 0.16% skin penetration in human volunteers |
No evidence of hormone disruption |
Skin allergy is rare |
It’s not all bad news as we have a choice in what kind of sunscreen we use and are armed with easily accessible information to make educated decisions.
When I’m finally able to travel to my favorite tropical destination or just lounging in the sun I will bring my favorite Tizo Sheerfoam Body and Face sunscreen it is so sheen and lightweight and I love that it works for both face and body. It does not clog my pores and stays on even during my long (sweaty) hikes! What is your favorite sunscreen?
And as always, follow your sunscreen with a clean and hydrating facial oil, like our EWG Verified Ultimate Face Oil!
